mindspin311

Tagging tech or whoever shouldn't be done. This question needs to be sent to the tech desk. This thread will be 10 pages by Friday with no progress made, other than a lot of people mad with each other.

Trying to make the Mini work. Daytona this summer water temps were stable at around 200F, tstat opens at 225 from the factory. Working to get a data setup to monitor oil temps. We added a cooler as precaution but have no idea what it's doing right now.

Great work. If we still had our E30s I would be all over this.

No no no no no. List me teams that are churning through tires every race weekend to take advantage of the speed and are directly winning/placing well because of it.

Can you list some more examples? What teams are winning because they're backing up the RE71/Rival/XYZ truck every race weekend?

We have not. Assume we will pick up 1-2s, but never had the desire. Maybe when the car becomes optimized further and tires are that one last thing to gain some time.

Because I think we're wasting time and energy on a rule that doesn't need to be implemented. Remove BILL RILEY and his professional budget, and this was never a topic of discussion.

So this seems like just another jab at GBU, but how many other teams are "winning" because they're taking advantage of tires?

We use RS4s unless they're sold out.

No. I think the issue is blown out of proportion.

So how are we verifying that a team is running that super snazzy clutch if they don't claim it?

I think you're looking for these. https://www.holley.com/products/electrical/connectors/parts/1040AOR

Sure seems pretty simple. Therefore not an option.

Would you be in favor of re-assessing points values on the FPV list? Some feel that Part A with a value of 50pts may provide less of a performance gain than Part B with a value of 10pts.Seems like if X car has a VPI of 300 because of a small fuel tank, then paying points, say 50 for a gallon makes sense and doesnt break VPI.

Would you be in favor of re-assessing points values on the FPV list? Some feel that Part A with a value of 50pts may provide less of a performance gain than Part B with a value of 10pts.