Jump to content

What? No Petition review thread?


dogtired

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, dogtired said:

;)

Damn cheaty BMWs....

 

LOL.  I don't take time to comment on them much but sent this in to the board:

 

Quote

Petition #2
Name:Shaan Mohammed
Member #CC000151
Date Submitted:10-6-16
 

While I agree with the premise of this petition, the first part would make some of the most popular fuel jugs, like the Hunsaker, immediately illegal:

"All fueling must be completed from an approved container with an
opening not to exceed 1”. "


This should allow for the 1.25", 2.25" and 3.0" OD options of the Hunsaker Jugs and therefore the 1" value is an unreasonable value for this restriction. Once altered to at least 2.25", the rule makes sense.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hose I have on my hunsaker is 1.25 OD, 1" ID. So I don't see the issue here, unless you have already cut your jugs back to the 2.25 and 3.0 marks...

This 1" rule exists in some other series as well and works ok on all sorts of jugs. Just my opinion.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We made adapters to reduce 2" ID down to 1" for our old JAZ fuel jugs. We now have Hunsaker and will probably cut them and use the same adapter as the threaded  "1 inch" outlet is actually about 5/8" ID on some of our jugs. So anyone that has already cut their jugs should be able to use them without an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike C was kind enough to clean up my  proposal . Thank you M.  Free the cheap plastic!!  

   

 We fit the 1in rule at the funnel  with the open cap fuel method.    Pouring driectlty into the cell with a funnel and open top jug  seems to spill the least amount of fuel . The cars with the long hose and such all drop way more fuel then we do.  I dont see a problem .

 Other bodies charge a lap per spill on ground.  I like that better.  Let each team sort out the method but with safety as the end game.   

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice to see a proposed change to the passing rules from the COO. My input will be that the entire passing section needs a rewrite. I've complained about that section a few times now, glad to see it's getting looked at. 

Also a good proposal from Phil about rear glass.

 

I have some choice words about another petition or two but I don't feel the need bother you lot with my opinions there :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, flyinglizard said:

Mike C was kind enough to clean up my  proposal . Thank you M.  Free the cheap plastic!!  

   

 We fit the 1in rule at the funnel  with the open cap fuel method.    Pouring driectlty into the cell with a funnel and open top jug  seems to spill the least amount of fuel . The cars with the long hose and such all drop way more fuel then we do.  I dont see a problem .

 Other bodies charge a lap per spill on ground.  I like that better.  Let each team sort out the method but with safety as the end game.   

We spill much less fuel with our similar fueling method.  We have added a catch can on our vent per the 2017 rules as well.  Those hoses on the jug can be a problem if they are removed too late,  Spill out of the filler neck of the car as well as the hose of the jug.  I see teams struggle getting them in as well, spilling before they have added any fuel to the tank.  This does not need a re write or modification.  If you spill you get penalized.  I like that.

Edited by drgchapman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Race Control
5 hours ago, Slugworks Paul said:

I submitted a petition?

 

In the case of your "petition" and at least one other, I used an email conversation we had as the basis.  You made a good point that I felt the membership should hear and consider.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chisek said:

 

In the case of your "petition" and at least one other, I used an email conversation we had as the basis.  You made a good point that I felt the membership should hear and consider.

 

Thank you Mike! I'm impressed that you took note and decided to do that on my behalf. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure those that can already go 2 hours will disagree with me, but the concept of "buying fuel" is a good way to help control speed creep and give another dynamic way to spend TCV points to teams not blessed with huge OEM capacities.

 

Unless you have a car that is right at 500 points, you are going to try to maximize your points available to your platform. For example, in its current trim I should have approx. 30-50 points left (finishing 2017 TCV now actually...) – so being a racer, my first thought is “how can I make my car faster/better with those leftover points?” Just about anything I can choose do at this point will make the car faster – valvetrain, headers, suspension, etc, all adding to speed creep. If a team can “buy fuel”, that now makes me stop and think – gee, should we make the car faster, or live with it's current performance level, and take an extra gallon or two of fuel?

 

Edited by pintodave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Team Infiniti said:

There will be a huge unintended consequence,cars that are already fast that have to fuel often will just get higher in the standings ....think blitz or twoth

 

IFFFF they have TCV points left over. 

 

If a team is already cheating on capacity, then the rules don't matter anyways. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...