Jump to content

hans expirations?


theblue

Recommended Posts

  • Technical Advisory Committee

as of right now that is true.

 

I expect they will change this in the name of "safety" soon..  One of our sponsors made quite a bit of money at a recent race by getting tech to tell people their hans were expired in gear-check.

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Huggy said:

as of right now that is true.

 

I expect they will change this in the name of "safety" soon..  One of our sponsors made quite a bit of money at a recent race by getting tech to tell people their hans were expired in gear-check.

I thought sponsors are here to cut our costs??? Like Jab said just send it out for $25  did both of our wife's and mine. Mine was from over seas real Hans with a FIA label  many techs are looking for the SFI cert now!  I think if you go through tech with a FIA label now at most tracks and wish to race with it they are going to tell you to go over seas to race with it!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, theblue said:

I was just looking at the rules to see how long my hans is good for with champ.    I don't see anything in the rules about expiration for this?   Only helmet SA2010 or newer.

 

Is no re-certification needed on these?

I always figured that when the a piece of equipment was past the date on the certification tag it was no longer certified,  So of the rule says SFI certified one that is past the date is not certified any longer.    The way the snell ratings work on helmets is a little different to me.  A helmet that has a 2010 Snell rating, always has a 2010 rating.   So race series decide how old they allow helmets to be by saying which ratings are allowed.    That's just how I understand it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, JDChristianson said:

I always figured that when the a piece of equipment was past the date on the certification tag it was no longer certified,  So of the rule says SFI certified one that is past the date is not certified any longer.    The way the snell ratings work on helmets is a little different to me.  A helmet that has a 2010 Snell rating, always has a 2010 rating.   So race series decide how old they allow helmets to be by saying which ratings are allowed.    That's just how I understand it.

Dunno bout the new ones, but my hans has a "date of manufacture" not a "date of expiration"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ABR-Glen said:

Dunno bout the new ones, but my hans has a "date of manufacture" not a "date of expiration"

Yea I think your right.   I also think somewhere it says it’s good for 5 years.  I don’t know its so complicated. 😜  I do know for sure I just got our Necksgen back with new tethers, new pad and new sticker.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Huggy said:

I’d love to hear the “certification” process

 

skeptical me, after seeing what happened at the recent race, says it’s “apply new sticker, collect money”

 

 

Your not far off, I think it is look at tether, bolt new ones in via the 2 straps, and apply sticker. Maybe glue on new friction pads. I can get mine done locally here, they can do it "over lunch".

 

In the same vein, what forces belts kept inside a box to die every 5 years and helmets to all of a sudden be a liability in 10..... The answer is usually because someone did something stupid and forced a rule....

 

Part of the motorsports game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Technical Advisory Committee
7 hours ago, Black Magic said:

 

Your not far off, I think it is look at tether, bolt new ones in via the 2 straps, and apply sticker. Maybe glue on new friction pads. I can get mine done locally here, they can do it "over lunch".

 

In the same vein, what forces belts kept inside a box to die every 5 years and helmets to all of a sudden be a liability in 10..... The answer is usually because someone did something stupid and forced a rule....

 

Part of the motorsports game

 

 

Part of a game we don’t have to perpetuate.

 

Questioning the logic behind how “others” do things is not inheritly bad.  Where I get in trouble is that sometimes (ok, most of the time) my message comes across as negative and there “aggressive” or dissenting.

 

 

If it’s really worthwhile, I’d be onboard.  But somehow I’m not sold that seat belts are “unsafe” after 5 years in my garage and my hans straps are worn out after being stored in my closet for 3 years.  We don’t replace belts in street cars that are stored outside and used daily.  

 

Sell me on that with real testing data.

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Huggy said:

 

 

Part of a game we don’t have to perpetuate.

 

Questioning the logic behind how “others” do things is not inheritly bad.  Where I get in trouble is that sometimes (ok, most of the time) my message comes across as negative and there “aggressive” or dissenting.

 

 

If it’s really worthwhile, I’d be onboard.  But somehow I’m not sold that seat belts are “unsafe” after 5 years in my garage and my hans straps are worn out after being stored in my closet for 3 years.  We don’t replace belts in street cars that are stored outside and used daily.  

 

Sell me on that with real testing data.

 

 

FIA, and SFI are doing the testing.  They also publish some of the results.

 

SFI Testing has shown that the belt material losses upwards of 50% of it's strength in something like 2 years.

 

These are the things I understand.

 

What I don't understand is the disparity between SFI and FIA testing, and why racing belts oxidize so quickly, and street car belts do not.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I remember someone saying that they assume that the car may be stored outdoors (because in places like So Cal that isn’t as crazy as it sounds) and they assume there is no glass or roof to prevent full sun exposure.  Once you make those assumptions, you can see where a belt or window net wouldn’t last very long.

 

If that is indeed the assumptions that they are making, then I personally think it should be discretion rather than rule.  I’ve rented in a lot of cars and have seen plenty of things that the car owner could have spent money on that would have made a much bigger difference than replacing a net that was a few years old.  My favorite was the seat that broke through the holes in the rusted floor pan during my stint and was only retained by the belts...... (yes, I pitted)

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Technical Advisory Committee
1 hour ago, thewheelerZ said:

^^^ @Huggy

Don't forget about window nets going bad and not being able to do what they are supposed to after the sfi date expires. 

  So in the last year I found 4 window nets dated 1998 or earlier, are they good still ? 

  Im not sure what causes the belts and nets to deteriorate and street belts do not , maybe the flame retardant treatment possibly ?  

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...