Jump to content

2022 BCCR


Recommended Posts

  • Technical Advisory Committee

I think this is the largest change in the 2022 BCCR. I am going to withhold my opinion on this change, but I am sure the BOD would like feedback on the proposed change so please post it here. 

9.10.2. Total fuel capacity, including all fillers and overflows, shall not exceed the OEM stated fuel capacity for the make/model plus two (2) gallons. This applies to cars equipped with OE fuel tanks and to cars with approved fuel cells.

9.10.2.1. Total fuel capacity may be verified by ChampCar via the drain and fill method. The fuel tank will be completely drained and then refilled with known amounts until fuel escapes the fill port.

9.10.3. Surge tanks are limited to 2-Liter (.53-gallons) capacity. Surge tanks do not count towards the total fuel system capacity.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators


https://champcar.org/web/pdf/2022bccr/2022bccrv1/2022_BCCR_V1.0.pdf

I will have to redo both cars.
The only issue I see is that it helps big tank cars. 
before we could equalize with them. But now that is taken away.

But I do see the safety side of it, after seeing how some guys have done their fuel fills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rule is written incorrectly for what they want to accomplish.   

 

Every car in this series currently with a cell is now no longer legal.   Has anyone ever seen anyone at a pit stop NOT fill up till fuel is overflowing or coming out of their overflow setup?    Every car with a cell will now be over the the stated capacity, unless you are filling directly into the cell which I personally haven't seen but i guess could happen.   

 

Who comes up with this stuff?   Why was this changed as there was NO petition for this?   This was NOT discussed or mentioned in the Annual BOD meeting/presentation.   Trying to slip this in the BCCR with NO member feedback is exactly what pisses people off and the series usually gets wrong anyways.   I guess the series never learns.   

 

I'm happy but my teammates will not be as this will mean we are going to WRL where their rule actually makes sense.   I just wish we would have known sooner so we could have registered for the Sebring 24 instead of the CCES races. 

 

Edited by Snake
  • Like 5
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Bill Strong said:


https://champcar.org/web/pdf/2022bccr/2022bccrv1/2022_BCCR_V1.0.pdf

I will have to redo both cars.
The only issue I see is that it helps big tank cars. 
before we could equalize with them. But now that is taken away.

But I do see the safety side of it, after seeing how some guys have done their fuel fills.

Just curious, but can't you just throw a displacement ball in there and be fine?

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Snake said:

The rule is written incorrectly for what they want to accomplish.   

 

Every car in this series currently with a cell is now no longer legal.   Has anyone ever seen anyone at a pit stop NOT fill up till fuel is overflowing or coming out of their overflow setup?    Every car with a cell will now be over the the stated capacity, unless you are filling directly into the cell which I personally haven't seen but i guess could happen.   

 

Who comes up with this stuff?   Why was this changed as there was NO petition for this?   This was NOT discussed or mentioned in the Annual BOD meeting/presentation.   Trying to slip this in the BCCR with NO member feedback is exactly what pisses people off and the series usually gets wrong anyways.   I guess the series never learns.   

 

I'm happy but my teammates will not be as this will mean we are going to WRL where their rule actually makes sense.   I just wish we would have known sooner so we could have registered for the Sebring 24 instead of the CCES races. 

 

Cars with cells may have to add some displacement balls.  Not a big deal,  those with long fillers high on the car have been "asking" for this sort of rule for a long time.  Just my thoughts.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Andrew D Johnson said:

I think this is the largest change in the 2022 BCCR. I am going to withhold my opinion on this change, but I am sure the BOD would like feedback on the proposed change so please post it here. 

9.10.2. Total fuel capacity, including all fillers and overflows, shall not exceed the OEM stated fuel capacity for the make/model plus two (2) gallons. This applies to cars equipped with OE fuel tanks and to cars with approved fuel cells.

9.10.2.1. Total fuel capacity may be verified by ChampCar via the drain and fill method. The fuel tank will be completely drained and then refilled with known amounts until fuel escapes the fill port.

9.10.3. Surge tanks are limited to 2-Liter (.53-gallons) capacity. Surge tanks do not count towards the total fuel system capacity.

This makes sense to me.  Too many have been pushing the limits on the length of the fill necks for some time now.  This also limits the tomfoolery that's been going on with stock tanks.   It also gives tech a reasonably easy way to enforce the rule in impound

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Snake said:

be as this will mean we are going to WRL where their rule actually makes sense.   I just wish we would have known sooner so we could have registered for the Sebring 24 instead of the CCES races. 

We can put a TKO in the car before November and just run WRL from there on out. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Snake said:

The rule is written incorrectly for what they want to accomplish.   

 

Every car in this series currently with a cell is now no longer legal.   Has anyone ever seen anyone at a pit stop NOT fill up till fuel is overflowing or coming out of their overflow setup?    Every car with a cell will now be over the the stated capacity, unless you are filling directly into the cell which I personally haven't seen but i guess could happen.   

 

Who comes up with this stuff?   Why was this changed as there was NO petition for this?   This was NOT discussed or mentioned in the Annual BOD meeting/presentation.   Trying to slip this in the BCCR with NO member feedback is exactly what pisses people off and the series usually gets wrong anyways.   I guess the series never learns.   

 

I'm happy but my teammates will not be as this will mean we are going to WRL where their rule actually makes sense.   I just wish we would have known sooner so we could have registered for the Sebring 24 instead of the CCES races. 

 

Can you explain how every car with a cell will be illegal? They may need to add displacement blocks for the extra fuel in their filler neck, but that’s it.   
 

FYI : most cells don’t hold as much as they list.  My 15g cell only holds 14.3gal. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Snake said:

Every car in this series currently with a cell is now no longer legal. 

 

Not necessarily true. This is a very large change in how fuel is measured. In the past the rule was technically "capacity", which would be the volume of the container if you were to pour it out. The new rule is fuel delivered, meaning how much your pump can suck up from fully filled (aka a pumpout test). 

 

Decent chance many cells are not able to deliver their advertised fuel volume. This would give you room to add filler neck. 

 

I think the enforcement process behind this will need some thought and description to competitors to make sure they know how to test at home the same way tech will test\enforce this. I think the ability to enforce useable fuel on track with useable fuel measurements in the pits will have challenges as well. 

 

My personal thought is that measuring delivered fuel presents some complexity that wouldn't be there if it was possible to define volume of the container instead. This is possible with fuel cells and most filler necks, since they are a box or constant diameter tube. Stock tanks present their own problem. 

 

I think this will bring more cars from the "didn't pick your car" into the "fuel starved and upset" camp. This will either speed up fuel parity conversations, help refine the value we place on fuel in VPI making more distinct (and perhaps correct) difference between fuel rich and fuel poor cars, or people will look outside the series. 

Edited by Black Magic
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There will be cars such as Miatas that might have to put displacement balls in their STOCK tank. With a miata and a stock setup, you can squeeze almost 14.9 gallons in the tank.  That is already .2 gallons over. 

 

Even if you have a stock tank, measure.  If you vented it properly, you may be over.

Edited by Final Turn Motorsports
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, petawawarace said:

Can you explain how every car with a cell will be illegal? They may need to add displacement blocks for the extra fuel in their filler neck, but that’s it.   
 

FYI : most cells don’t hold as much as they list.  My 15g cell only holds 14.3gal. 

Lol.  People spending $$ know thus and order bigger.  We are already using displacement blocks.  No sense in ordering a cell if it doesn't give you the most fuel legally allowed right?  Sounds like you left .7 gallon on the table, we didn't.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

RVA Graphics & Wraps should be able to assist us on the expansion and contraction of fuel due to temperatures. 
A cold fuel system at Road Atlanta in the spring will hold more fuel than an overheated system at the VIR 24. It's not the system., but the temp of the fuel itself.
So how is that going to be addressed? Do we use a correction factor based on the type of fuel you are using and the fuel temperature?

https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/mc-mc.nsf/eng/lm00129.html

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, petawawarace said:

Right, so there shouldn't be much of an issue unless your running a big filler neck, or you've got a stock tank that's holding significantly more than the stated capacity.  Both would be easy fixes with displacement balls.

If you have a plus 2 cell then you're screwed and will need to displace for lines, filler neck, filters, etc.. 

 

Of course, this has no impact on the BMWs that already hold 17 gallons OE and go ~2 hours on fuel, which is pretty predictable. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bill Strong said:

RVA Graphics & Wraps should be able to assist us on the expansion and contraction of fuel due to temperatures. 
A cold fuel system at Road Atlanta in the spring will hold more fuel than an overheated system at the VIR 24. It's not the system., but the temp of the fuel itself.
So how is that going to be addressed? Do we use a correction factor based on the type of fuel you are using and the fuel temperature?

https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/mc-mc.nsf/eng/lm00129.html

 

 

Bill, The volume of the system will not change with temperature. The amount of energy and the distance that you go on that volume of fuel will change.  This will be constant across all cars racing at that time, so really shouldn't be a concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...