Jump to content

Continental ExtremeContact Force becoming available, have ye tried them?


ETR

Recommended Posts

I'm starting to see these available at a few sources, has anyone tried them out yet?  A bit more expensive but claim to be just a tick off the now unavailable RE71R's (in 15's) and supposedly more durable?  

 

Looking for feedback besides promo claims.  I'm considering trying a set at Barber.... we've always run RS4's but they are terrible in the cold rain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
10 hours ago, ETR said:

Got some 225/45-15’s on the way from Phil’s tire, so we’ll see how they feel at barber. 

When did you order them?

 

I tried to get some from Phil's before H2R and they were out almost instantly. I've had an order outstanding with TR since June, and haven't seen mine yet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wink said:

When did you order them?

 

I tried to get some from Phil's before H2R and they were out almost instantly. I've had an order outstanding with TR since June, and haven't seen mine yet


Saturday. Got an email from Kim within minutes of ordering saying “We’ve got two. You want those now or 4 headed your way in a few days when we get more?”  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, turbogrill said:

https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/chartDisplay.jsp?ttid=273

 

image.png.53badf27a247dc950aa34b951620d308.png

So a tad faster than the AD052? But they also showed RT660 being faster than A052, so not sure what to take form that.

 

 

 

  

You left out the brake and g-force graphs that provide an indiction of how "sticky" the A052 really is.   I would venture to guess that the difference in time is due to the soft A052 sidewall and need for extra camber (not sure of the other tires' characteristics).  I would think the A052 is probably still the "stickiest"....I'm definitely interested in knowing if any of the others will last 8 hours (or more).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a new set of Cooper RS3-Rs and Conti Extreme Forces. We may test them this weekend, or it may wait until AMP.

 

The Coopers (255/40-17s) weigh in at 26.7 lbs and durometer 71. The Contis weigh 23.7 lbs and durometer 78.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mhr650 said:

Reducing unsprung and rotational weight is far more valuable than just reducing overall weight. Reducing unsprung weight makes the suspension work better, reducing rotational weight helps with braking and acceleration. 

 

So that is why tire weight is important? There is no other nerdy thing? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Grant said:

We have a new set of Cooper RS3-Rs and Conti Extreme Forces. We may test them this weekend, or it may wait until AMP.

 

The Coopers (255/40-17s) weigh in at 26.7 lbs and durometer 71. The Contis weigh 23.7 lbs and durometer 78.

Durometer is not an indicator of traction. It's way more complicated than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Grant said:

We have a new set of Cooper RS3-Rs and Conti Extreme Forces. We may test them this weekend, or it may wait until AMP.

 

The Coopers (255/40-17s) weigh in at 26.7 lbs and durometer 71. The Contis weigh 23.7 lbs and durometer 78.

Curious on your tire testing,  how do you go about the process?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/20/2021 at 9:47 PM, turbogrill said:

 

So that is why tire weight is important? There is no other nerdy thing? 

In addition to what MHR stated....the "heavier" the tire usually means the "bigger" the tire...hence its heat tolerance should be greater.  I know I don't think in terms of weight in relation to heat tolerance but rather size (255 vs 245 vs 235 etc.).  In terms of weight I approach it exactly as MHR stated...reduction of unsprung and rotational weight is a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 10/20/2021 at 3:40 PM, Grant said:

We have a new set of Cooper RS3-Rs and Conti Extreme Forces. We may test them this weekend, or it may wait until AMP.

 

The Coopers (255/40-17s) weigh in at 26.7 lbs and durometer 71. The Contis weigh 23.7 lbs and durometer 78.

Did you ever test these tires? Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 12/22/2021 at 12:14 PM, veris said:

Did you ever test these tires? Thanks.

We ran 255/40-17s on my car at the Firm vs. Cooper RS3-Rs. They both run the same lap times down to a few hundredths (1:16.7). But the Contis are 3 lbs / tire lighter, have 1" less tread width, are harder, and run cooler. They also don't seem to want higher pressures despite being lighter. Lateral grip with the Contis was barely measurably higher, but we had more inside wheelspin issues (NC LSDs suck).
 
So we are probably switching to Contis. They should hopefully 🤞 last longer, and on some tracks we can't push 10/10ths all weekend on a single set of Coopers. Also the narrower tread width should make the car less of a water ski in the wet. I also expect the less weight and narrowness will help more on tracks with longer straights.

@MJNOVA
you guys may want to give the Contis a try.
Edited by Grant
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
56 minutes ago, mindspin311 said:

Anyone else have experience on the Conti's? I'm itching to buy something to do some testing.

 

Although not mentioned in this thread, @Grant used the Conti's at Ozarks with pretty good results.  I forget which thread he talked about it, maybe one of the NC threads or the Ozark one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, CoachMK21 said:

 

Although not mentioned in this thread, @Grant used the Conti's at Ozarks with pretty good results.  I forget which thread he talked about it, maybe one of the NC threads or the Ozark one.

Uh, 2 posts above yours?  Lolz.

 

Well, he talked about them anyway.  Not in relation to ozarks though.

 

Yea, they won Sunday at ozarks and layer down some ridiculous times on them.

Edited by wvumtnbkr
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So we've done a couple sets of these and have really liked them, all from Phil's Tire with recent date codes.  Just got a set from Tire Rack and they are over a year old, having spent winter in a cold warehouse I'd assume?  These are older than the previous sets we've used before.  Considering the intended use would you gripe about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ETR said:

having spent winter in a cold warehouse I'd assume

I have been to Tire Rack and it is far from a cold warehouse and would think they will be fine. You can reach out and ask for peace of mind they have great customer service.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...