Jump to content

Are we really enforcing the BCCR


gundy

Recommended Posts

Do we believe the tech deck answers or the rules?

 

9.22. AERODYNAMIC DEVICES 9.22.1. Aerodynamic devices not to exceed width of OE bodywork (fenders, bumpers, doors) when viewed from above. Note: Side mirrors are not included in bodywork width. Maximum wing height 12” above roof. Maximum wing drop-back 12” behind car. A splitter is any horizontal device installed from the centerline of the front axle extending a maximum of 12” out of the front of the vehicle. An air dam is any vertical device installed from the nose of the bumper down.

 

I am referring to air dams and splitters. The rules say from nose of bumper down, neither of these are from the nose down. Top one is close.

2019-11-28 - Front Air Dam

Air Dam - 10 points

Tech interpretation and enforcement is any non-oem vertical aero component is an air dam.  See Photo for Example.
Jay Mauney - Chief Tech Director

download_attachment.php?kb_att=24

 

Q2.
Is this 1.5" piece of garden edging the same 10 points as 15" piece of plastic or aluminum that wraps around the entire front of a Miata?

download_attachment.php?kb_att=20

A2. 
Yes, any non-oe horizontal component added to the front facia of a car is considered an aero component and the addition of that component is charged 10 points. Tech may charge additional material cost if the component covers an area beyond the parameters of a standard air dam.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020-10-19 - Air Dam Angle

Q.
The rules do not currently specify a a tolerance on how "vertical" the air dam must be. Other series (e.g. NASA, SCCA) put this at 5%.

Is this currently defined for ChampCar?


A.
There is no definition on angle. However if you have a scoop type i.e. angled air damn you will get points for both horizontal and vertical at 20 points.

Jay Mauney

 

 

according to rules this is neither air dam or splitter but charged 20pts instead of material.

image.png.b1b0aa0316d99fbcaff1d6ecf55fc898.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, gundy said:

Do we believe the tech deck answers or the rules?

 

9.22. AERODYNAMIC DEVICES 9.22.1. Aerodynamic devices not to exceed width of OE bodywork (fenders, bumpers, doors) when viewed from above. Note: Side mirrors are not included in bodywork width. Maximum wing height 12” above roof. Maximum wing drop-back 12” behind car. A splitter is any horizontal device installed from the centerline of the front axle extending a maximum of 12” out of the front of the vehicle. An air dam is any vertical device installed from the nose of the bumper down.

 

I am referring to air dams and splitters. The rules say from nose of bumper down, neither of these are from the nose down. Top one is close.

2019-11-28 - Front Air Dam

Air Dam - 10 points

Tech interpretation and enforcement is any non-oem vertical aero component is an air dam.  See Photo for Example.
Jay Mauney - Chief Tech Director

download_attachment.php?kb_att=24

 

Q2.
Is this 1.5" piece of garden edging the same 10 points as 15" piece of plastic or aluminum that wraps around the entire front of a Miata?

download_attachment.php?kb_att=20

A2. 
Yes, any non-oe horizontal component added to the front facia of a car is considered an aero component and the addition of that component is charged 10 points. Tech may charge additional material cost if the component covers an area beyond the parameters of a standard air dam.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020-10-19 - Air Dam Angle

Q.
The rules do not currently specify a a tolerance on how "vertical" the air dam must be. Other series (e.g. NASA, SCCA) put this at 5%.

Is this currently defined for ChampCar?


A.
There is no definition on angle. However if you have a scoop type i.e. angled air damn you will get points for both horizontal and vertical at 20 points.

Jay Mauney

 

 

according to rules this is neither air dam or splitter but charged 20pts instead of material.

image.png.b1b0aa0316d99fbcaff1d6ecf55fc898.png

Ok this has pissed me off for a while... I don’t know if this is your intention or not, I’m ranting about many previous posts now and I’m probably not actually answering your question.
 

I see the rules say horizontal and vertical... then I see some posts where people say “well if mine is 45 degrees it’s free because it isn’t a splitter or an air dam”. Wake up dummy! It’s doing the function of both splitter and air dam, if tech doesn’t charge your 45 degree thing as both, then you have gotten away with murder. 
Let’s be sensible here and stop nit picking a few degrees here or there... if you think you have come with with a clever way to get something for free, you haven’t, tech will (should) just assign you points.

Edited by enginerd
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lolz...

 

Splitter is horizontal (ish).  Call it within 15 degrees and you won't have an issue.

 

Yes, that little bit of edging on bottom of miata should be 10 pts.  So, don't waste your time with it.  Just make an airdam or nothing at all.

Edited by wvumtnbkr
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, enginerd said:

Ok this has pissed me off for a while... I don’t know if this is your intention or not, I’m ranting about many previous posts now and I’m probably not actually answering your question.
 

I see the rules say horizontal and vertical... then I see some posts where people say “well if mine is 45 degrees it’s free because it isn’t a splitter or an air dam”. Wake up dummy! It’s doing the function of both splitter and air dam, if tech doesn’t charge your 45 degree thing as both, then you have gotten away with murder. 
Let’s be sensible here and stop nit picking a few degrees here or there... if you think you have come with with a clever way to get something for free, you haven’t, tech will (should) just assign you points.

I agree with you it should not be free.

But if there is nothing going back under the car or sticking out in front of the car where is the splitter. So charge as a air dam , ether 10pts or materials.

The small lip is not a air dam because it is not from the nose of the car so materials only 7.5pts vs 10pts

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you already know what you wanna hear.....

 

That little thing is 100% an airdam.  A crappy one that wouldnt be very efficient.  Just because it isn't as good as a full on airdam doesn't mean it isn't an airdam. That is on the nose / bumper of the car.  

 

That being said, I sure as he'll wouldn't pay 7.5 pts for it....

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, wvumtnbkr said:

If you already know what you wanna hear.....

 

That little thing is 100% an airdam.  A crappy one that wouldnt be very efficient.  Just because it isn't as good as a full on airdam doesn't mean it isn't an airdam. That is on the nose / bumper of the car.  

 

That being said, I sure as he'll wouldn't pay 7.5 pts for it....

The whole secret of the current rule set is to make sure that you get your money’s worth on everything you spend points for

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, mhr650 said:

The whole secret of the current rule set is to make sure that you get your money’s worth on everything you spend points for

 

And ideally have all parts of your car have 2 or more jobs (if possible).

 

It's all about those efficiencies! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gundy you need to get out and drive some more and let tech fight this one out 🙂

 

as Rob said go big and make it work or don't waste the points.

 

It's kind of like a Miata team that made it from duct tape and cardboard at no points.......... bull cookies! It is still an aero device.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, espog said:

That little lip at bottom of miata

Zero points if it came on the factory Miata standard package. 
 

I think a picture above referenced “lawn edging to make an air dam lip”, no miatas came with lawn edging. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, gundy said:

I agree with you it should not be free.

But if there is nothing going back under the car or sticking out in front of the car where is the splitter. So charge as a air dam , ether 10pts or materials.

The small lip is not a air dam because it is not from the nose of the car so materials only 7.5pts vs 10pts

This is why tech has the  final say.  If it acts as a splitter.  Guess what?  It's 10 points.  Putting the rule book under a microscope will not win you races.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Clifford Beisler said:

This is why tech has the  final say.  If it acts as a splitter.  Guess what?  It's 10 points.  Putting the rule book under a microscope will not win you races.

 

You are so right, but if I don't put it under a microscope and win I can rest assured that someone that I beat will complain that my interpretation is not the same as the intent. I would rather not be hit by surprises at impound if I can help it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, craig71188 said:

If this is your biggest beef about aero.....

Perhaps the concern should be the MASSIVE undervaluing of aero vs. other mods. 

It wasn't long ago that most publicly felt aero was not effective at the speeds we compete at 😂

 

Times seem to have changed

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, craig71188 said:

If this is your biggest beef about aero.....

Perhaps the concern should be the MASSIVE undervaluing of aero vs. other mods. 

 

45 minutes ago, Wink said:

It wasn't long ago that most publicly felt aero was not effective at the speeds we compete at 😂

 

Times seem to have changed

 

It’s like I told a friend of mine a few years ago the first time he saw the old Biohazard when it was even more radical than he can run it nowadays. They count on the people running in this series to not be competent enough to get all of the potential out of the aero components they install.

 

That has improved a bit over the years, and nowadays most of the people running aero effectively end up at pretty much the same setup. You still see plenty of bad aero additions at the races, but they sure look cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wink said:

It wasn't long ago that most publicly felt aero was not effective at the speeds we compete at 😂

 

Yeah, back when guys were running cars like this one, where the weight and drag clearly negated any downforce increase:

th?id=OIP.Boj6f9pXPNanRMXXNansIwHaFC%26p

 

Now they all look more like this:

th?id=OIP.1AifjWaosMmqSoIpEfoiUQHaC9%26p

 

Times definitely changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Technical Advisory Committee
14 minutes ago, Bremsen said:

 

Yeah, back when guys were running cars like this one, where the weight and drag clearly negated any downforce increase:

th?id=OIP.Boj6f9pXPNanRMXXNansIwHaFC%26p

 

Now they all look more like this:

th?id=OIP.1AifjWaosMmqSoIpEfoiUQHaC9%26p

 

Times definitely changed.

 

First photo:  Lemons South @ CMP circa 2010

Second photo: Champcar @ Road Atlanta, 2018

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, gundy said:

I agree with you it should not be free.

But if there is nothing going back under the car or sticking out in front of the car where is the splitter. So charge as a air dam , ether 10pts or materials.

The small lip is not a air dam because it is not from the nose of the car so materials only 7.5pts vs 10pts

So in other words it is not very effective.  Therefore just take it off and use your 10 points somewhere else.

 

This might be applicable too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohDB5gbtaEQ

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, MMiskoe said:

So in other words it is not very effective.  Therefore just take it off and use your 10 points somewhere else.

 

This might be applicable too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohDB5gbtaEQ

 

 

I made it bigger to get the benefit of of 10pts .

My point is if I really wanted to run the small lip I should be able to claim 7.5pts  whatever my reasoning or wisdom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chris Huggins said:

 

First photo:  Lemons South @ CMP circa 2010

Second photo: Champcar @ Road Atlanta, 2018

 

Yeah, the big shift seemed to occur around 2013-2015 after the switch to a points based (and not $$ based) ruleset.  Seems like yesterday.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Technical Advisory Committee
30 minutes ago, Bremsen said:

 

Yeah, the big shift seemed to occur around 2013-2015 after the switch to a points based (and not $$ based) ruleset.  Seems like yesterday.


I didn't know we were allowed to build cars until I ran against Biohazard in 2012. Before that, I was just bringing my $500 oval claimer class car.

Then I went from:

image.png.ac82e198ed8ef43460a5989fe8519584.png


to: 

Holy Rollers - Team Biography and Pictures - TireRack.com ChampCar  Endurance Series

Edited by Andrew D Johnson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...